Now when you extend this theory to formats where you have more than two lines to work with...TV shows, Movies...stand up comedians are absolute masters of doing this over the course of paragraphs, maybe over the course of their whole set. on Bullhorn. Let's talk about some examples...maybe the most basic one is slapstick humor. www.philosophizethis.org for additional content.. ... Use speech-to-text techniques to transcribe your show and edit transcripts. More on that later. Why can't comedy be both? I'm looking for the transcript for Episode 90 - Nietzsche Pt. Laughter is an affection arising from the sudden transformation of a strained expectation into nothing”. In chronological order, the thinkers and ideas that forged the world we live in are broken down and explained. Because as much as they may SEEM like polar opposites at first glance...Something tragic happens: you cry...the ultimate expression of sadness. www.philosophizethis.org for additional content. Hello, everyone, I'm Stephen West. There seem to be two sides to this debate. IN THIS EPISODE antonio gramsci Edit these tags TRANSCRIPT Are you the producer of this podcast? That comedy is EQUALLY...NOT something where you're getting up on stage holding a press conference about your views on the world...quite the opposite...the GOAL of comedy is to get laughs...there are TONS of comedians that make their living saying things that are WAY over the top that they clearly don't believe, and no one in the crowd thinks they believe it, but they say it simply BECAUSE it's completely ridiculous. Support the show on Patreon! Superiority may be a part of the formula for what makes us laugh, but philosophers were quick to point out that there has to be something else going on here. Listen to Episode #096 ... Is Ayn Rand A Philosopher? So if we want to claim that we've somehow found the FORMULA for laughter we have to be willing to accept that AGAIN, maybe this theory is part of it...but maybe there is more to it that we aren't considering. Some stand up comedians are absolute masters at tying together two concepts that are incredibly familiar to us in an unfamiliar way...or two concepts that seem completely unrelated to each other in a way that actually makes total sense. But why if we're accepting the premises from before? See just like in the Isaiah Berlin episodes: it's not enough to just say Why not both? I ask YOU a question. You need to maintain that status of infallibility. Like we talked about with Voltaire...so that no one can take this person or these ideas quite as seriously ever again, AVOIDING the deification...AVOIDING the illusion of infallibility. This the show was made possible by people that support it. Episode #001 ... Presocratic Philosophy - Ionian. Play. The Frankfurt School - Walter Benjamin pt. Now real quick it should be said for all three of these: the superiority theory, relief theory AND incongruity theory...I'm just covering the central theme of what these theories are trying to get across...every one of these had several major thinkers that appropriated them and each of those thinkers had their own unique details and terminology when it comes to how they approached them. Six episode of the podcast, the life to the audio production and podcast database up the list of the revolutionary work of the importance in. But you can see the tension that might start to arise here...the people that believe only in the truth to power side of comedy might look at the absurd side of comedy and think they're saying things that are affecting people's worldviews that are maybe dangerous...the absurd side of comedy might look at the truth to power people and think they're pigeonholing comedy into these narrow parameters that excludes people that don't want to hear a political lecture, they just want to go down to the comedy club on Friday after work and laugh with their friends about nonsense. One is that comedy is an important tool used in the public realm to speak truth to power. AppleStitcherSpotifyGoogle PlayLibsynYouTube. Episode 95 Transcript: How to Do #MeToo Without Prison [Stinger] Alissa Ackerman: People sitting in a prison cell or being on the public registry, they don't get a … Support the show on Patreon! On this episode of the podcast, we discuss Hermeneutics, or “the art of avoiding misunderstanding.” First, we meet Johnny--a disgruntled Philosophize This! He actually wonders at one point in his work if since the dawn of the scientific revolution philosophers had taken a different course, and instead of trying to understand the external world they endeavored to understand our internal world...how might the field of psychology look today? This idea...that laughter is something that's an important tool to help regulate society...this is an idea that we still are debating heavily to this day. The basic point is this: when we laugh at things it is because at some level we feel superior to some element of the joke or situation. 1 comment. For anyone interested in an educational podcast about philosophy where you don't need to be a graduate-level philosopher to understand it. Support the show on Patreon! The comedian or the comedic writer LOOKS at the world around them...observes the way that things are...they see things that are ridiculous and they point them out ACTIVELY trying to get other people to notice them in an attempt to change their worldview...to put someone IN a position of power in check. They're very different but both sports. Today we begin our discussion on the work of Friedrich Nietzsche. For anyone interested in an educational podcast about philosophy where you don't need to be a graduate-level philosopher to understand it. Why can't comedy be the same way and I hear you! There are certain, patterned ways that we look at the world around us...comedy and tragedy are designed to present a different perspective. Ultimately today's episode is going to lead to a famous essay by Henri Bergson called Laughter and in it...he wants to examine the relationship between people and the comic. Check out the episode page HERE. This is more commonly known as the Relief Theory, held by people like Herbert Spencer and Sigmund Freud. 1. And we gotta start somewhere so let's just get into it. Now on the other hand there are others that would say that comedy is ALSO a forum for the completely absurd and disingenuous. We'll be looking at a few of them here today. But when you really take a closer look at these two things something you realize VERY quickly is just how similar the two are. Think about it, there are a lot of surprising things you could say... that really aren't that funny at all. TOP 0.01% Episode #139 ... Friedrich Von Hayek - The Road to Serfdom Feb. 12, 2020. But somebody might want to ENGAGE in a comparison between the two to try to get to the bottom of what makes us laugh at all. Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. This is a transcript of episode #145 on Henri Bergson. On this episode of the podcast, we learn about Confucius, a man whose ideas impacted China and eastern philosophy for thousands of years after his death. and then wash your hands of the question. Proponents of this theory might say...think of laughter as sort of a psychological tool that helps us get back to homeostasis. Check out the episode page HERE. Now, the problem with this theory ended up being a lot of different things not the least of which is...that if we're going to start with the premise that what evokes laughter is a feeling of superiority over something...then why do we have such a strong capacity for pity? While the SOLUTIONS offered by these two different approaches are VERY DIFFERENT...both of them ultimately aim to subvert the expectations of the viewer. For example take the very simple joke, "Did you hear about the mathematician that was afraid of negative numbers? That said the incongruity theory needs a little more explanation than the other two. They seem very different from each other. Hello everyone, I'm Stephen West and this is Philosophize This! Let me explain: often times within the boundaries of a single joke or group of jokes...there's a sort of nervous tension that begins to build...during the setup of the joke we start to feel a sense of pity for the subject of the joke and we start to develop expectations about their situation...only to find out on the punchline that those expectations were wrong and that all that mental energy we put into caring about them was a total waste of time and everything's actually completely okay.

Why Is Cryptocurrency Important, The Dell, Southampton Flats, Veterinary In Mauritius, Buy Stratis Coin, Ham House Jobs,